Reassessing the Park Chung Hee Era, 1961-1979: Development, Political Thought, Democracy & Cultural Influence. Park Chung Hee’s Governing Ideas: Impact on National Consciousness and Identity. Seoul: Han’gukhanja-hanmun mun’gyoyukhakhoe. Hanjagyoyuk-ŭi hyŏnan-gwa kwaje – sŏng’gyŏk, mokp’yo, iron-ŭi kyŏmhae. Segyehwasidae-ŭi ŏn’ŏminjokjuŭi-wa chŏngbohwajŏllyak, Kwach’ŏn-si: Chŏngbot’ongsin chŏngch’aek yŏn’guwŏn. Kim, Sang-bae, Chin-yŏng Kim, and Chi-yŏn Kim. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. In: The International Relations of Northeast Asia. Northeast Asia in the Local-Regional-Global Nexus: Multiple Challenges and Contending Explanations. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press. In: Confucian Traditions in East Asian Modernity: Moral Education and Economic Culture in Japan and the Four Mini-Dragons. The Reproduction of Confucian Culture in Contemporary Korea: An Anthropological Study. Elizabeth, NJ and Seoul: Hollym International Corp.

Divided Korea: The Politics of Development, 1945-1972. Hanja pyegi’nŭn taegwao.kukhan honyong-ŭro ‘dong asiasŏng' sallyŏnaeja. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America. The Garrison State in Pre-War Japan and Post-War Korea: A Comparative Analysis of Military Politics. Korea’s Development under Park Chung Hee: Rapid Industrialization, 1961-79. Honolulu: Faculty Center for Korean Studies, University of Hawai‘i. Linguistics and Language Policies in North Korea. In: The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security. Jepperson, Ronald J., Alexander Wendt, and Peter J. Rethinking Ethnicity: Arguments and Explorations. Wczesna prasa – modernizacja pisma i języka. In: Identity and Change in East Asia Conflicts. Democratization and National Identity in the China-Taiwan and Korean Conflicts. Horowitz, Shale, Uk Heo, and Alexander C. State Security and Regime Security: President Syngman Rhee and the Insecurity Dilemma in South Korea, 1953-60. Language, Culture, and National Identity.

Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. In: Schriftfestschrift: Essays in Honor of John DeFrancis on His Eightieth Birthday. Seoul: Government of the Republic of Korea. Han’gŭl chŏnyong silch’ŏn’yogang sihaeng 1958nyŏn (1958).

Han’gŭl chŏnyong-e kwanhan pŏmnyul chejŏng (Enactment of the law concerning han’gŭl exclusivity] (1948). Han’guk sayong-e daehan insik chosa – 2002/2014nyŏn pigyo (2014). Nationalism, Liberalism, and Progress: The Rise and Decline of Nationalism. In: The Earliest Stage of Language Planning: The “First Congress” Phenomenon. The Emergence of Korean Script as a Symbol of Korean National Identity. Korea versus Korea: A Case of Contested Legitimacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Įckert, Carter, J., Ki-baek Lee, Young Ick Lew, Michael Robinson, and Edward W. The Origins of the Korean War: Liberation and the Emergence of Separate Regimes, 1945-1947. (accessed on 2 September 2015).Ĭumings, Bruce 1981. Korea Herald, (English Edition), 3 July 2013. (accessed 30 September 2015).Ĭho, Chung-un. Transcending Paradox: The Chinese Middle Way “Perspective”. (accessed on 20 September 2015).Ĭhen, Ming-Jer. Legacies of Empire and Occupation: The Making of the Korean Diaspora in Japan. Army Command and General Staff College.Ĭaprio, Mark E. Scenes from an Unfinished War: Low-Intensity Conflict-Korea, 1966-1969. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.īolger, Daniel P.

Personal Identity, National Identity, and International Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.īloom, William. This paper’s assertion is that Korea’s vacillating response regarding Korean nationalism’s digraphic conflict is eloquent of the complex confluences that formed Korean ethnic nationalism, and therefore, Korean national identity.Īnderson, Paul S. This phenomenon can be viewed through constructivist paradigms, or can be interpreted as implemented pragmatic policies exemplifying instrumentalist nationalism. Koreans for over a century have responded to “issues of script” based on socially-created narratives. These responses have ranged from the abolition of Hanja or the enforcement of Han’gŭl (Chosŏn’gŭl) exclusivity, to the re-establishment and strengthening of Hanja education. Emerging from liberation the two Korean states over the next several decades would “engage” Hanja with diverse and fluctuating positions and approaches at different times. This paper is an examination of the many points of intersection between Korean nationalism in both Koreas, and Chinese characters (Hanja), as well as a contextualization of the historical and, at times, antithetical relationship or binary consisting of Hanja and Han’gŭl (Chosŏn’gŭl).

Jun yu hanja